-
AudioLink Hands-On: Understanding Indicator Light Patterns | MED-EL
AudioLink has an indicator light at the top right corner. A pulsing green light indicates that AudioLink is switched on and in standby mode. A pulsing orange light indicates that AudioLink is switched on and is in standby mode, but that the battery is low and will need charging soon. A permanent orange light shows that AudioLink is currently charging. A permanent green light shows that AudioLink is fully charged and ready to use.
-
HISTORY - (पाषाणकाल से जोरवे संस्कृति तक) HISTORY FOR CIVIL SERVICES
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE THE CHANNEL .
-
מדעי ההתנהגות כמדע (ד"ר הנרי שלינגר)
BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS: A NATURAL SCIENCE OF BEHAVIOUR There are a number of different sciences that study behavior. Behavior Analysis is one of them. For example there are people who study the effects of genes on behavior, there are people who study the effects of the brain and the nervous system on behavior. Behavior Analysis studies the effects of environment on behavior and I would call Behavior Analysis a natural science, and by the way, the Natural Sciences are: Chemistry, Physics and Biology typically.
-
Обзор керамических ИК ламп для брудера и инкубатора Obzor keramicheskikh IK lamp
Center temperature What is the temperature in the brooder Main advantage What's inside a ceramic lamp Why use a power regulator Power 10%, what is the temperature of a 100 W lamp? Power 50%, what is the temperature of a 100 W lamp? Power 100%, what is the temperature of a 100 W lamp? Power 10%, what is the temperature of a 200 W lamp? Power 50%, what is the temperature of a 200 W lamp?
-
Tree Care Safety Briefing How to Avoid Chainsaw Kickback
Hi, guys! It’s Gene Basler here/ Thank you for tuning in. Today’s safety topic is Avoiding Chainsaw Kickback. First we’re going to go over what kickback is, second we’re going to look at the part of the chainsaw where kickback primarily occurs third we’re going to look at a video or two–don’t worry! there won’t be any blood fourth we’re going to discuss eight quick tips to avoid kickback fifth and lastly we’re going to do a quick recap I’ll be entering the bullet points in the description below for handy reference I would like for you to do six quick things for me first put your name or your nickname in the comments section so that I have documentation that you completed this safety briefing second please give me a thumbs up third please subscribe fourth click the notifications bell so that you know when your next documentable safety briefing is available fifth share this video with your crew mates and, well, with everyone you know in the green industry last but not least please leave a comment or a question what did I forget?
-
Impressive Autism results
(light music) - The question before me has to do with autism and I’m asked by a mother, my child has autism, can the Unseen Therapist really help here? Can you really do that? Isn’t that impossible to cure, alleviate, or whatever? Well, I don’t think so. I’ve seen lots of cases with EFT, both with and without Unseen Therapist, where the behaviors change. I’m not saying the autism was cured in these cases, but the behavior was changed, the fly-off-the-handle type anger, not there, the irritation, the irritability, the inability to concentrate.
-
#ChasseurdeFantomes #GhostAdventures #ZakBagans Ghost adventures Hôtel Goldfield
nick and i were about to push the limits even further by performing one last investigation aaron could not make this trip from its countless documentations articles and media attention this haunted hotel stands in a class of its own weeks before this production my main goal was to secure an investigation at the goldfield hotel because of its notoriety as one of the most haunted locations in the world and the hotel has tried to have been renovated several times but the ghosts that occupy it won’t let that happen so it sits abandoned and nick and i were to be padlocked inside for an entire night in 2001 the goldfield hotel was featured on scariest places on earth a documentary that aired on the fox network psychics from all over the world claim that the seventh portal or gateway to the spirit world is located in the basement because of its geographic ley lines it houses more evil spirits than any other place we’ve ever been uh red roberts he is the owner of the goldfield hotel the reliable source that this is among the top 10 spookiest places in the world you’ll see a lot of doors but they do their doors to nowhere really because they they want it the former owner like there’s a door there see yeah but in here there’s nothing it’s been this is just a bathroom yeah this one so when me and nick are in here tonight it’s gonna be pretty pitch black huh it’s gonna be black well there’s a little moon later on tonight it’s supposed to be a full moon yeah so we’ll have a that’s that’s that’s a benefit to you yeah why is that a benefit i’ve heard that the full moon provokes more paranormal activity right that’s what i’ve heard is this an original piano that was here it was here when i bought it other than that i can’t say so we don’t know because i don’t know well hopefully hopefully the person that used to play this piano will play some nice music for me and nick later tonight virginia says she’s heard being played with no one here if you came in here there’s supposed to be a gunman up there that they see every once in a while what do you mean by a gunman an old gun really like an old gunslinger yeah so it’s supposed to be the ghost of a gunslinger yeah the ghost of a gunslinger and according to virginia he comes around that corner right over to the left to the left he comes from the north side and stands there in the hallway the time i let you out of here tomorrow morning you will have known this hotel relatively yes yes you may have some stories of your own i kept thinking what it was going to be like during the night being locked inside with no electricity and complete darkness we found a goldfield local who knew of the hotel’s hauntings and told us during the filming of scariest places on earth a camera operator had her camera lifted out of her hands leaving marks on her arms and sustained emotional trauma from the event supposedly lady was holding the camera while the cameraman went upstairs and he told her to be careful with it and it uh took flight with her i guess the camera just lifted up out of her house left marks on her and she took off running i don’t know i heard she started breaking down and crying yeah she’s somebody from this town it was but they’ve never said who it was and i bet we can’t find that person to come with us on the investigation anytime you get her inside the building envy you guys are being allowed to go in there all night yeah that intrigues me about the hotel i believe in orbs i have a son that got killed in an accident at age 10 and i have pictures of where he got heard at and other pictures of a monument that i built for him and i have orbs in those pictures really i saw the pictures of the hotel in the same orbs we found other goldfield locals that seemed to frighten us more than what we were hunting for type activity so although his presence was a bit awkward he did have some credible information regarding the hotel’s paranormal history about room 109.
-
Freedom of the Shelves: Untangling the Confusion on Federated Identity, Access Controls, and Privacy
I think it’s time to get started welcome everyone I’m Cliff Lynch the director of the Coalition for Networked Iinformation and it’s my pleasure to welcome you to this breakout session from the spring 2020 virtual member meeting that CNI is conducting we are approaching the middle of that meeting which will run through the end of May the topic today is untangling the confusion on federated identity access controls and privacy this is a very important topic particularly now that we are in such a distributed mode and relying so extensively on federated access to provide our user community and our institutions would access to a whole collection of diverse resources this is also a very fraught issue in the sense that people have expressed a lot of opinions on it and particularly on we work like our a21 that often is not particularly well grounded I think in the specifics about the technology there’s a lot of misunderstanding about where what what’s dictated by technology what’s dictated by policy and how the two fit together I cannot think of anyone more authoritative and well qualified to speak to this than Ken Klingenstein Ken has been advancing these technologies tirelessly since the early days of CNI and internet2 and it’s been a great pleasure and a great honor to work together with him over the years on these topics so I am just absolutely delighted to be able to welcome ten to this virtual meeting we will take questions at the end Beth Secrist will moderate those you can type in questions by using the Q&A tool at the bottom of your screen and please feel free to queue up questions at any point as they occur to you and we’ll just sort them all out at the end but it’s fine to put them in as we go along so with that welcome all and I’m gonna disappear and turn it over to ten Thank you, Cliff just want to check that the sounds coming through all good good okay and the the title slide is up on the screen so with that if I can do the advancing I want to talk a little bit about what’s driving all of the developments that as cliff indicated are now bubbling up in the environment what we see is our target and the target hasn’t changed since 2000 when these ideas first started percolating up but I want to talk in detail what those look like what’s coming along in terms of the infrastructure many of the pieces are in place sliding into place and then I want to talk a little bit about the work that’s ahead because there was still gaps I don’t know that this is gonna finish on my watch but I’d love for it to arrive ultimately intact on that far shore and have an environment that appreciates our traditional interests in privacy while providing new levels of personalization and access control some of those gaps I don’t think I’ve received a proper attention and so I’d love to make sure that we give give give some focus on that and then one of those gaps is can the users really manage their privacy and we’ll talk a little bit about what Daniel solo of calls the privacy paradox about users wanting to have a lot of privacy but then giving it away for rubble squeeze toys so with that let’s talk about the drivers for change certainly our federated identity has taken a strong root in the internet whether you’re asked to log on with your institutional credits credentials or with your Google account or your EarthLink account since there may be some people in this crowd still do EarthLink or whatever other identity provider it the pattern is increasingly that you use in authentication at a single spot and leverage it at many different locations across the Internet another major driver for change is protection of IPR and content there are websites that this community is well aware of things like Sai hub which have stolen a massive amount of content from journals and the journal publishers are rightfully concerned about keeping their business alive so they can can publish these kinds of research work and so they’d like to stop that kind of bulk downloading that enables those kinds of IPR violations and federated identity is a part of that answer um this rich five is the opportunities with personalization I can make the world look exactly like what you need on the screen without knowing who you are I can take your colorblindness your other physical disabilities and make adaptive changes to the screens and the presentations of content without knowing exactly who has those kinds of characteristics similarly I can post comments and dialogues and have privacy and anonymity persistent anonymity all of the techniques that the trolls use in rushar can be used positively in other ways in in those kinds of conversations there’s a massive requirement and now around compliance with international and state regulations wouldn’t it be nice if I could say national regulations as well as state for the US but I can’t but I can talk about and we will talk briefly about gdpr we’ll talk a little bit more about what’s happening a North in Canada because what they’re doing I think of as the state of the art in privacy protection so there are these compliance requirements we all have them no leg no legislation comes along these days that doesn’t seem to have a compliance aspect I’m attribute release friction when we envision this beginning in 2000 we didn’t expect there to be so much friction about releasing attributes because attributes are the currency of this ecosystem and they need to flow and whether they flow on an institutional decision or on a use the decision they need to flow and we’ve made one attempt in the federated community with the research and scholarship bundle or attributes but that hasn’t gotten the traction we hoped and there are certainly needs for attribute bundles beyond the RNs bundle and we’ll talk about those in a second there’s some interesting work happening being led by Heather Flanagan and others in the RA 21 Club and then there’s a mistake we made in 2000 that we’re paying the price for and we need to fix which is selective release of values from a multivalued attribute when we first started designing group memberships in those early years of this development we decided we’ll stick all your group memberships on one attribute how many could there be and this sucker will never fly anyway so we don’t have to worry well the suckers in the air there are people who have a thousand group memberships and right now with today’s technology for relying party says I want group memberships of this person so I can do access control they may get all a thousand and why aren’t we supposed to be privacy-preserving I’ll come back to that and finally there’s a number of visionaries out there who believe that transparency and user control principles for our society regardless of the technologies what do you want then and freedom of the shelves this is that oh the ability to climb into some musty building I guess they’re not so musty anymore and walk down the shelves and and look at content and have privacy and have the ability at the same time to check books out and to make notes and all of the other things that we believe a free society should have so in the federated version of that we have a global set of identity and attribute providers we have access control techniques to limited license content so that we recognize the business models of the world and there should be places where content is protected by some kind of gated community we want everything to be privacy preserving that’s what we set out to do and I think we’re there and then finally the compliance with the national and international regulations I can’t say we set out to be compliant with those because they weren’t around at the time but they’ve come along so here’s a little drill down on each of those four categories for the identity providers we want a world with more than Google we want Google in there and Facebook and Amazon but we also want universities we want your business addresses we want the earth links maybe we even want linkages to the national identity efforts that are going on no longer in this country but in Europe there are efforts especially in northern European countries to build national identities that can be used for tax purposes for voting purposes and for participating in community interactions and perhaps even for accessing the kinds of content we’re talking about today that whole bundle of stuff is talked about as the IDIS activities in Europe and my guess is they’ll be going slower because everything’s about to go slow and then we’d like to see a global set of attribute and badge providers and identity decorators people who don’t do identity but decorate identity with verified attributes and credentials it may be your membership in and in a professional society it may be your accreditation from some service it may be government and private sectors decorating your identity with stuff that would be useful in voting environments such as your precincts your disabilities being provided by medical doctors so that those adaptive screen technologies that I talked about early on can be done with you concealing your privacy but reconcile recognizing you need for adaptive screen presentations scalable access controls were a big part of the vision and we’ve moved somewhere along the way it would be the traditional create read update and delete mechanisms of crud but we also have needs for much finer grain controls my poster child for this is wiki’s Roth and familiar with a wiki if you want to have different access controls for different parts of the wiki so glute memberships for example could determine which parts of the wiki you chose you were committed to visit we would need then to provide that kind of fine-grained control that is one of the Holy Grails were aiming for is that kind of control over wiki mom it turns out when I talk about signaling that we don’t have that piece in place we do have tools in the in the tool box we use your affiliations as a student faculty staff etc you we look at entitlements I mean teittleman’s tend to be commissions that are granted by the enterprise based upon a sharing of business logic with a resource provider that’s a very common in the library space who can get to these journals the journal publisher will agree with the institution on a set of rules and then the institution will compute eligibility based upon those sets of rules and the attributes that they have about the user but the attributes never leave the institution just a entitlement that whoever this user is they’re permitted to access this content group memberships give us a much finer and more subtle mechanism for doing access control we can again use your groups to say you can get to this part of the wiki or that part of their wiki cuz you’re a member of the group and then finally some of the major infrastructure as a service platforms that serve the research the science research community like Globus and tack give very sophisticated access control mechanisms so we’re largely there on this piece more needs to be done but at the beginning I think one of the participants in all this said you know glute memberships gonna solve 80% of the access control issues that that turned out to be correct and so just having the group tools that have been excellent a privacy-preserving approaches now the the water gets muddy even though initially we thought this was going to be the most straightforward path identifiers turned out to be a very complex space they can be opaque they could be transparent and email address is often transparent a opaque identify as a legion in other parts of the world and they can be session based and you get a new identifier every time you log in or open a window or they can be persisted and you can have a and identifiers still anonymous but is available time you log in and go to a site they can be identified as to be reassigned above versus permanent that turns out to be very important within the access control space because if you’re going to grant permissions on the basis of identifier and in institution changes who that identify belongs to you might be giving access to someone you don’t intend to so it it turned out to be a thick space it still is and and and it’s some of the stuff that the RA 21 crowd is nobly wrestling with um attributes we’ve learned need to be well managed otherwise they grow like weeds so the entitlements versus the groups distinction I made earlier attributes are often scoped if you’re going to say somebody is a of a certain affiliation with an institution what light do you have to speak for that institution in some cases if your Harvard and you’re the Registrar at Harvard sure you can speak for that but when you get to the five colleges the claremont colleges in in the LA area well any one of those five colleges may make assertions about an individual being a participant of a different college than the one making usage and those need to be permitted with appropriate so we have to scope them and then we have to make them have meaning on the wire because you’re gonna have your own little subtleties of of attributes and then if we’re going to exchange him with other people we need to find a lingua franca on the wire that will make the other side do a correct interpretation of the information they’re receiving many many years ago in the early design of the internet there was one of the shibboleths as aware was be careful in what you said and be liberal in what you accept and that has played out in terms of on the wire attributes as well out of those identify as an attributes we build persona and you can visit a website unauthenticated authenticated but anonymous authenticated but pseudo anonymous which says you may not be I’m easily identified by people looking at the identifier but it’s the same identifier for the same person in this thread so every time that identifier is used it’s the same person making the comment I mean then you can have verified credentials as well and that’s the coin of the realm in many of the places where you need to have tight security etc and then all of these persona can be decorated with attributes and that’s much of the work up ahead and then once you have those decorations building attribute based gated communities I have a variant we might get to in demos at the end called the scholarly garage named after a other share the community activities and in the scholarly garage it’s a gated community but within there I can have identity I can have five is he I can make comments in a rich number of fashions relative to my identity and finally I want to make the point that even if you’re going with a fully private mindset in all of this stuff a strong active assent occation is very helpful so strong identity needs are out there even if you only are all focused on privacy we want to make sure that the account has not been prolonged that even if the rest of the world doesn’t know who this user is it’s been a fair mapping compliance so national international and community so almost everybody on on this webinar is familiar with GDP our Canadian stuff I want to introduce because people are known not quite as familiar and I think the Canadians have nailed it and then at one point several years ago I was giving presentations at NIST about some work we would presentations at CNI about some work we were doing finished this has a few survivors fuddled in its wonderful old building in gatorsburg and boulders still trying to maintain the torch of advancing identity in the US and then some states have stepped forward those of you in California have the California consumer Privacy Act CCPA as something to work with the other side of the coin is codes of conduct we you don’t want necessarily compliance from some external source but you want a community to create its own rules and adhere to them these are often then self asserted in terms of compliance um one of the ones that we’ve been looking for in our in our world is the we feds code of conduct we feds is the international federal or any Federation space I’ll talk about that code of conduct in a second and then another code of conduct that we’re trying to normalize is around baseline expectations of how enterprises both IDPs espy and federated operators do their jobs properly and then increasingly there’s compliance activities that we need to do and some of us are getting a gleam in our eye about a reporting infrastructure in the institution and enterprise where there’s almost a policy layer on top of these technology layers that would allow all of the reports that need to be generated for compliance to be done in a normative fashion versus a handman managed spreadsheet gdpr I’m going to move through fairly quickly again people are familiar with it it only it affects a lot of US institutions because we have students who land in Europe and the suddenly such subject to GDP are we have European students on our campuses subject to GE GDP or so lots of sensitivity to this stuff I want to highlight the basis for release and purpose of use as key issues because we’re not doing enough of this every time an institution and an enterprise releases information to another third-party it has to record the basis for release of that is a limited six I believe basis for release and it’s something that we as identity providers and our institutions need to be doing and then those things may get audited to see if we did the proper basis for release we are heavily reliant at this point on contract as a basis for release as a tool and it’s legitimate but it’s limited the purpose of you stuff is interesting as well it’s required by gdpr that a user be informed of the purpose for which their data is being used you’ll see those fields in the consent demo are due at the end of this talk you want to normalize those things you want to have users understand what those various purposes of use tend to mean purposes abuse have been developed in the advertising space and they’ve been developed in healthcare and they haven’t been developed in other verticals and it would be helpful to have that I’m finally gdpr talks about when is consent to be used and not to be used that said I want to segue into the Canadian activities where legislation called Peter was was created maybe 15 years ago as a as a personal information protection act in Canada and then the model the Canadians used to implement in infrastructure around that legislation is to create a system of private identity providers typically banks and those identity providers have come together to create the pan-canadian trust framework and Dayak and they have drafted an elegant set of rules for acting in the digital I particularly like their stuff because they dive into consent and notice and again it was part of the original vision of federated identity and the Canadians get it and where the Europeans tend to say legitimate interest mm-hmm consent is hard the power ratio balances the Canadians say consent will normally be sort it’s going to be opt in it’s at the time a trans transaction and it can need to be persistent or just for that one time you should be able to withdraw the consent but it applies to future transactions that’s the right interpretation you’re not going to get the data that you released last year back it should be explicit and in language that will be easily understood and wouldn’t it be nice if you had a privacy console where you can manage your privacy preferences you’ll see I hope all of those features in the demo at the end putting together the answer then from the piece parts that are coming along we have baseline expectations as the first element to level the trust fabric to move from a best-effort environment to a shared expectations environment dynamic metadata because we succeeded and so the metadata bundles have gotten huge and we need to not ship them around anymore but provide them on demand we need IDP discovery it happens as a result of dynamic metadata it’s an essential first step in the process and the RA 21 software that we’ll look at is doing that institutional and attribute release is the next element to get those attributes flowing and reduce that friction you’ll see that software in action but there’ll be there’s so are gaps in the metadata and signaling as with wiki’s that I alluded to earlier and then finally there’s a variety of community standards where as a community we need to take a deep breath and wade into some of those are what I call informed content so that users can make an informed consent decisions purposes of use privacy policies we need community taxonomy x’ so that we have shared understandings of what’s happening we applications to be a lot more aware of attributes versus grab all the identity that it can take we need to be able to translate data minimization from a nice concept into which specific attributes are minimal and which ones are optional so these are the five pieces that we’ll talk about we’ll move progressively through this the first three are well in hand the next the bottom two still need some work if we get all this together what do we deliver a privacy experience that can be managed by both the institution and the user which gives the user informed choices but not intrusive Lee allows the institution to manage access controls we want users to have choice but we want users not to be able to suppress negative information which we want which the institution wants to transmit like this user is not permitted to have this kind of capability we want to address the cognitive load of the user you’ll see that in this green design we were very careful to keep the white space and the thinking opportunities we want meaningful choice and we want to be able to do compliance it’s got a scale and hopefully can be slid into places what this won’t deliver all the other ways that privacy is a threat and it with the fact that uses still express high importance to their privacy but then give it away for bright shiny objects baseline expectations is something that is happening widely now at least in the u.
-
#Denebunu.com Nedir ? Ben Nasıl #Ücretsiz Ürün Aldım ? Profil Nasıl Olmalı ?
NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. .
-
#Denebunu.com Nisan Kutusu Açılımı / Ücretsiz Kutu Alma
NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUB-TEXT NO SUBTITLE NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUB-TEXT NO SUBTITLE NO SUBTITLE. NO SUB-TEXT NO SUBTITLE NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE. NO SUBTITLE.